#MILL HARM PRINCIPLE SUMMARY FREE#

His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.” This is a key point of departure between liberals and anarchists in terms of the libertarian side of the political spectrum. In this thesis, I question the current prohibition policies of cocaine use, production, and trade. Mill does concede that some types of damage to others should be admitted to, in order to promote utility, but then it is doubtful that these could be properly. John Stuart Mill also put forward the renowned liberal argument that “the only purpose for which power can be rightly exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.

Whereas graphic images of pornographic acts undoubtedly have the capacity to offend, access to such material in the private realm does not directly impact upon others provided it does not cause actions that threaten other people’s liberty. Societal attitudes towards pornography are a good illustration of Mill’s distinction between self-regarding actions and other-regarding actions. To be very brief, this principle carries the possibility of lying about and punishing a wholly innocent man to get a needed result of preventing offences. However, a sanction may be imposed when such actions impinge upon the freedom of others.

#MILL HARM PRINCIPLE SUMMARY FREE#

He argued that the individual is free to engage in self-regarding actions even when society considers those actions to be improper. John Stuart Mill (1859) made a clear distinction between self-regarding and other-regarding actions. For important reasons, liberals resist censorship or even reject it en- tirely. Perhaps the most thought-provoking contribution to consider within liberalism is the harm principle. John Stuart Mill and Pornography: Beyond the Harm Principle.

Mill harm principle summary